![]() ![]() Software for Jetson performance comparison Here you can get the document with the benchmarks. We did the same kernel time measurements for NVIDIA GeForce and Quadro GPUs. As far as concerns H.264 and H.265 encoders, they are working at the hardware level, so encoding can be done in parallel with CUDA code and we should be able to get very high performance. ![]() Image processing from RAW to RGB or RAW to JPEG are standard tasks, and now developers can get detailed info about expected performance for the chosen pipeline according to the table above. We've compared just the basic set of image processing modules from Fastvideo SDK to let Jetson developers evaluate the expected performance before building their imaging applications. These are estimates for GPU processing times, though there are pauses between kernels and CPU-based processing also influences on total processing time which will be more than total kernel time. ![]() This is done to show the maximum performance benchmarks on GPU for a specified set of image processing modules which correspond to camera applications. ![]() Total kernel times are calculated for the values from the gray rows of the table.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |